Project competition Allmend school complex, Horgen

Published in German. Sign in and TEXFY shows the texts in English. Sign in

Location: Canton ZH
Procuring office: Gemeinde Horgen

Go to the official tender

Awarded

According to the simap publication. Values that are not given are deliberately missing here.

Awarded to

As published on simap.ch: winner and price (with or without VAT, as stated).

Award of 29.09.202633 bids
- BDE ARCHITEKTEN GMBH, WinterthurCHF 60’000.00 without VAT
- Rank 2 KKWSM3W GmbH, ZürichCHF 40’000.00
- Rank 3 JOP Architekten GmbH, HorgenCHF 35’000.00
- Rank 4 Markus Schietsch Architekt:innen GmbH, ZürichCHF 30’000.00
- Rank 5 Lorenz Baumann, ZürichCHF 20’000.00
Further ranks as published on simap.ch; sums and key figures count the first rank only.

Awards of this contracting authority

Justification

Das Preisgericht empfiehlt der Veranstalterin einstimmig, das im 1. Rang klassierte Projekt TAKA-TUKA der BDE Architekten GmbH, Winterthur zur Weiterbearbeitung.

AI summary

Pro

With Pro, an AI summarises this tender: services, requirements, conditions, dates and award criteria, with key figures, a timeline and the weighting, each with the literal quote from the publication.

This is how an AI summary is structured

In brief
Services
Requirements
Conditions
Dates
Award criteria

An example of the structure without content: no summary is stored for this tender yet.

What is being procured?

Scope of work

Der Wettbewerb betrifft den Neubau der Schulanlage Allmend in Horgen mit Schulräumen für 18 Klassen, einem Doppelkindergarten und Musiknutzungen zur Deckung des wachsenden Bedarfs. Ziel ist ein architektonisch und städtebaulich überzeugendes Gesamtkonzept, das Schule als Lebensraum versteht und die bestehenden Bauten und Anlagen auf dem Areal sinnvoll integriert.

Es handelt sich um einen einstufigen, anonymen, offenen Projektwettbewerb nach SIA 142 für interdisziplinäre Teams aus Architektur (federführend), Tragwerksplanung und Landschaftsarchitektur.

Im Fokus stehen hohe Qualität, funktionaler Betrieb, Nachhaltigkeit sowie wirtschaftliche Lösungen über den gesamten Lebenszyklus.

Key facts, codes and options

Type of contract: Not evident from the available publication data.
Type of construction: Building construction
Procedure: Open procedure
Trades: BKP 29 – Professional fees
CPV: CPV 71240000 – Architectural, engineering and planning services
Options: Not evident from the available publication data.
Variants: Not evident from the available publication data.
Partial offers: Not evident from the available publication data.

TEXFY assessment: Products, installations, quantities, technical specifications and exclusions are not structured fields of the publication. TEXFY does not analyse the free text on them: check the original text and the tender documents.

Market data for this service

From awards published on simap.ch, without rankings and without rating companies.

Comparable awards

Architecture, canton of Zurich, last 12 months

58 awards, bids (median): 5.

Awards: Architecture

Range of award prices

Architecture, canton of Zurich, last 12 months

CHF 56’21210 % of the prices were lower

CHF 357’585Median: half were lower

CHF 4’757’61610 % of the prices were higher

8 out of 10 award prices were between CHF 56’212 and CHF 4’757’616.

From 65 published award prices in CHF from 26.11.2025 to 06.11.2026, with or without VAT, as published. A single contract can differ widely.

Official source

Go to the official tender

simap project number: 34729
Publication number: 34729-02
Covered by international agreements: Yes

Checked against simap: 10.11.2026, 18:02

Export

This is not an official publication. Only the data published on the platform www.simap.ch is authoritative. Dies ist keine amtliche Veröffentlichung. Massgebend sind die auf der Plattform www.simap.ch veröffentlichten Daten. Anyone who reuses this data complies with the conditions of simap.ch: terms, section 6.

More in the guide

Award, reasons and appeal

Contract awards in Zurich: monthly reports

Report a data error

Is something on this page wrong, missing or badly translated? We check every report. We correct our own classification and translations ourselves; what simap publishes can only be changed by the contracting authority.